Jump to content

dtarin

Members
  • Posts

    800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dtarin

  1. If your site is that large (GWs I assume here), you're better off running them in separate variants. Also with a site that large, you may not need to model the entirety in the first place, as long as you have a scene that is representative of the overall site. 

  2. If your trees are over the terrain, you can place them onto the terrain with any offset desired using edit > set auto altitude. If your terrain surface is limited, and you need to add trees that are outside the boundary, then you can manually adjust the edges of your terrain by moving points individually in the X, Y, or Z direction (you can select multiple at once, it is not restricted to a single point, in case previous statement was misleading). After the terrain surface is adjusted, use auto altitude on all objects. 

     

    2024-06-27_14-18-50-1.png

    2024-06-27_14-18-5-2.png

    2024-06-27_14-20-33 -3.png

    2024-06-27_14-22-15-4.png

    2024-06-27_14-26-31-5.png

  3. This can all be done with batch simulation. Advanced simulation > Batch simulation. Prior to running the batch, set the output parameters under Output File, and make sure File name is checked under Output file. You don't need to give any specific name, just have this checked (you will define the output file name in the batch parameter file in the next step). Then proceed to Batch simulation to set the parameters and configure the batch file. 

    2024-06-18_9-58-44.png

  4. 15 hours ago, hritik said:

    When comparing different manufacturers for a particular site, I obtained the  results which are varying. Are there any default parameters for PV loss due to irradiance levels and PV loss due to temperature in PVSYST? On what parameters do these factors depend? These come from the PAN file, resistance values/low-light performance, temperature coefficient

    Is it possible to get gain due to loss from irradiance levels? Not sure what this means

    What should be the ideal values for Module quality losses? There are no ideal values, depends on the one doing the simulation

     

     

     

     

     

  5. Create multiple variants with the different bifacial settings you wish to test (height from ground, albedo), check the box below. Spacing and tilt are a little different, those inputs for bifacial inputs are derived from other places (i.e., shade scene, orientation menu).

     

    image.png.17ecb83fcd03dcaa94b7fd2d55d5917a.png

  6. My guess is that the warning is with respect to the HV portion, which you dont have shown in the image. The OND file doesnt account for LV losses. LV losses are zero since the MV transformer is connected to the inverter. You will define a MV line loss however from the MV inverter(s) to the HV transformer(s). Since the OND file accounts for the MV transformer, maintain 0% in the no-load and full-load loss. 

×
×
  • Create New...