Jump to content

dtarin

Members
  • Posts

    897
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dtarin

  1. Bumping this. Any plans to incorporate this in future versions? Modern design software spit out shd or pvc files quite easily (both should be able to be imported). I think the only hangup with this is the partition definition for each shade scene, but if this were added to 3D shadings parameter, the user could define the geometric area of a partition that gets applied to each scene. Diffuse shading can be set to central tracker for quick analysis by default, backtracking activation is already an option for batch sims. 

  2. You can always create one from notepad just to get it loaded or extract the site information from the .prj file. Look for the following (and remove the text after the underscore). Some changes will need to be made; I think you just need to add the version below the "Comment=..." line. 

    If you're creating from scratch, I think the main things you need are coordinates, altitude, timezone. The meteo data that is contained in the site file is not used in simulation. 

     

    PVObject_SitePrj=pvSite
    ....
    ....
    End of PVObject pvSite

     

  3. 16 hours ago, Linda Thoren said:

    Hello,

    Indeed the PVsyst simulation is hourly based, so any sub-hourly phenomenon has to be averaged. This includes the weather data or self-consumption.

    The main reason for this limitation is that we currently consider that Perez’s transposition model is not well calibrated for sub-hourly data (EUPVSEC 2023).

    Sub-hourly simulation should be available in PVSyst 8.1, but the release date is not yet defined (it will be after 2025).

     

    Will the Perez-Driesse model be included as an option in the future?

×
×
  • Create New...