Jump to content

GTI instead of GHI

Florent D.

Recommended Posts

Dear Florent D.

You can import your measured GTI data as a “Custom file” in the PVsyst database. For the Meteo data, tick the box marked “Measured global on plane” and indicate the column with the GTI data, then in the Variables tab you specify the Azimuth and the tilt.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Linda,

While it's true you can import GTI data this way, I believe PVsyst will once calculate GHI from this imported GTI and then calculate GTI internally. This 2 GTIs will probably differ by some value. I think Florent was asking if it's possible to keep the exact values as imported.

Of course correct me if I am wrong, best regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, PVsyst does at the moment recalculate the GTI from a GHI and DHI values. GHI and DHI may be generated from an input measured GTI.
This is because as things stand, a MET file can be used with any orientation, i.e., it should be useable with an orientation other than that of the measured device. Moreover, the GTI itself does not have all the needed irradiance information, we need to decompose into diffuse components and direct component in order to make all calculations e.g., IAM or shadings.

However, recomputed GTI and original GTI will in general differ by at most 1%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I see that the .MET file always compute GlobHor and DiffHor from GlPMeas.
So I tried to change manually the GlPMeas, GlobHor and DiffHor to my field measurements.

Even using Hay in the Project Settings, my simulation output shows:

  • GlobHor = modified GlobHor;
  • DiffHor = modified DiffHor;
  • GlobInc < modified GlPMeas (4,9%).

So what is the rule? Is there a range that GlobHor can change from GlPMeas and disable the GTI measurements? 

Is there any Advanced parameters to change and allow  the use of measured GTI?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In My MEF only selected the GTI and Tamb.

So I create "reference MET" and then change manually (encode62) the GlPMeas, GlobHor and DiffHor to my field measurements.

Lets call the last one as "edited MET".

When I use "edited MET" to simulate the system, the hourly output shows:

  • GlobHor = edited GlobHor;
  • DiffHor = edited DiffHor;
  • GlobInc < edited GlPMeas (4,9%).

The simulation don't use my edited GlPMeas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see. This is normal then, because the edited GHI and DHI were chosen in order to give back GlobInc close to GlPMeas when transposed. If you change them, you will not get back the same value.

When comparing transposed measured GHI and DHI to GlPMeas, you are accounting for:

  1. fundamental uncertainty in the measurement (calibration, noise, ...)
  2. uncertainty in the measurement system installation (orientation, position...)
  3. Hay model uncertainty

Because of this I cannot tell you what is the single source of the 4.9% discrepancy.

One thing that is on our roadmap is use one of either measured GHI or DHI in addition to GlPMeas in order to have a better equivalence at the GHI and DHI level. I agree that it would be better with such an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...