dtarin

Export the data (values) from the graphs and you will get short circuit values for V and I.

Electrical shading loss has been around for a long time. It is likely the 7.2 report was run on linear shading, or the site was modeled perfectly flat with backtracking enabled and no shading objects present to cause electrical shading loss.

You can change the settings for both types of messages. The shade scene module count has no impact on simulation results.

2x28 = 4 vertical, 1 horizontal for half-cell module

norm.inv(Pxx,0,1). P99 is 2.33, not 2.35

Cannot get custom tracker to save in v8.0.12. Once shade scene is exited, it remains all trackers.

Change this under advanced settings. I suspect there might be something else going on, but here is how to override the error.

Have you tried creating a copy of the SIT file in the Sites folder, to see if it shows up in the list?

I am seeing difference of 0.15% in 8.0.12 which is non-trivial. Aging tool on top, PVsyst report result on bottom.

Useful Out and Egrid are the same. I suggest including InvOut It seems IL Pmax will include grid limitation loss when there is a limit applied in the IL Pmax figure, even if it is set to account for loss separately under energy management. I suggest quantifying IL Pmax as its defined in energy management, or by default include POI loss as a separate value, and let users add together if they want. EArrayMPP is more useful than EArray, I recommend adding it or replacing EArray with it.

PVsyst doesn't output 8760 files past year 36. It will complete the simulations and generate the pdf report, but not the excel output. v8.0.12

Simulate with as few trees as possible. Take into account things like the total elevation at the top of the trees (tree height + ground elevation) and the distance relative to the panels.

export simulations to excel. output the variables you need and analyze from there.

This doesnt look off but not enough info here. The difference between 100m and 50m is .07%. Between 8.5m and 50m, energy plateaus. Since you havent included those simulations, it looks linear there.

Losses due to specific objects are not isolated. Shading from turbines will be included in both near shadings and electrical loss in the loss diagram. To isolate the turbines run models with and without them, take the delta of shading losses and you can calculate whatever you need. You will also have energy with this, so you can easily calculate overall energy impact monthly, etc.