PranavK

Hi @Michele Oliosi and @Linda Thoren, I am working on a carport system and trying to model the Bifaciality correctly. The snip of the system and the bifacial modelling from PVsyst are attached below. I have 6 (majority) and 4 modules in portrait orientation in a carport table. But, the bifacial system definition shows the pitch and shed total width as 2.28m, which is only the length of a single module. When I try to model the system as per the actual array, i.e., 6 modules in portrait, making the shed total width 13.72 m and the effective pitch between the two arrays approx. 19.92m, the system definition brings back the shed total width to length of 1 module, i.e. 2.28m. Am I modelling the bifacial system correctly or is there something I am missing?

Hi @Michele Oliosi, I, too, am looking for the individual inverter-level output data from the 8760. My system has 9 inverters. So, is it possible to get the individual inverter level generation data for each of the 9 inverters in separate columns after PVsyst simulation in the 8760 directly? Could you please guide me on this? Hi @solarDG1470, Did you figure out a way for this? Does PVsyst provide this data or is there some other way around? I would really appreciate it if you could share your knowledge on this. Thanks!

Hi @Michele Oliosi, I am experiencing a similar issue currently. I've run two iterations of the same project in two different versions 8.0.14 and 8.0.19. All the parameters are the same. The Shadings: Electrical Loss acc. to strings in the latest version jumps to 15.1% compared to 4.1% from the previous version. Also, the Inverter loss over Nom. inverter power loss was 4.5% previously which later decreased to 0.5%. The loss diagrams from both versions are attached. Could you please help with this?