Chen

Ok，I wonder if our software can be considered this.

Dear sir： For the bi-facial module system , when calculating the cable loss of strings, should the current on the rear side of the modules be considered in our software？ thanks！

OK， u are welcome

Dear sir： I found that the inclination angles of the two are not the same. Is it a bug?THANKS

OK，thanks very much！

Dear sir： Can you take a look at this problem? Why is the backside mismatch loss calculated separately from the front side, rather than being added to the front side like irradiation. thanks！

When I completely shade the front side of the module and allowed the back side to receive light, I found that the loss due to weak light was relatively high.

OK，Thank you for your detailed answer.

ok，I agree with your viewpoint, but do you think this calculation is reasonable? if the fornt side of module receive irradiance of 1000 W/m², and the rear side of module receive irradiance of 200 W/m², front side：(f × 22- f × 22) / (f × 22) = 0% (relative) rear side：(f × 21.34 - f × 22) / (f × 22) = -3% (relative)

I understand. What I mean is, if the irradiation intensity on the back of the module is relatively low while that on the front is relatively high, so does it imply that the low-light performance of the rear side is worse?

Because the irradiance of the front side or the rear side of PV module will be different, in this case, there will be a difference in conversion efficiency between the front and back sides,with respect to 1000 W/m².

thanks

Dear sir： Has the software taken into account the low-light performance on the rearside of bifacial module？ thanks

Dear pvsyst team： If I have an irregular trackers system, with some different pitches and GCR, what is the difference between the reference trackers and automatic mode （ deselecting the reference pair of trackers）？what is the automatic mode？ thanks！

OK，thanks.

Will the temperature increase and power decrease when local solar cells of photovoltaic modules experience hot spots be considered in the power generation simulation？thanks

OK，thanks！

Dear PVsyst team： I saw an article in the literature that mentioned a comparison between the settings of UC and UV and actual simulation tests. Can we see if there is still a need to optimize UC for bifacial modules？ thanks de Oliveira A K V, Braga M, Naspolini H F, et al. Validation of Thermal Models for Bifacial Photovoltaic Systems under Various Albedo Conditions[J]. ESS Open Archive eprints, 2024, 63: 06323163. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pip.3892 CTG_PIP_Temperature.pdf

OK IRev = Iph +aRev *V，for aRev=800mA/V^2, 800/1000*（-5.2）*（-5.2）= 21.632 (A) ；the externally forced current is 7.93A； how to calculate IRev？ thanks

Excuse me, Prof.Andre Mermoud is I the reverse current in this formula，so a more accurate representation would be IRev = Iph +aRev *（V+Rs * IRev） ；and the externally forced current is IRev？ thanks for reply.

as we can see the three values on the figure， the V (-5.2V）,I（7.93A） and P（128W），Is there a formula that can explain their relationship，thanks！

Dear pvsyst team： I am using this software to simulate the temperature and power when a cell is local shading. I find that “externally forced current= 4.4A” is all the same for the different solar modules. What does it mean？ thanks！

sorry ，i find a mistake in my sentence，the solar size is 210mm*105mm，so final result is 44/ ( 0.21*0.105*29) =25 = 94 （℃）.The results are basically the same as those of pvsyst.

just choose "Generic_Mono_700W_Half_Bifacial.PAN" for example. Here, Uc = 29 W/m²·k, or say Uc = 29 W/m²·℃, and the size of the cell is 150 mm*210 mm. For one solar cell shading, if the temperature rises by 1 ℃, it need power 0.21*0.15*29= 0.9135（W），and the cell power consumption now is 45W，45/0.9135= 48.17 （℃），by adding 25 ° ambient，the result is 73.16（℃），which is not quite consistent with the results shown on the graph （95℃）.Can you help me check if there are any errors in my deduction？ thanks

in my opinion，the module VOC corrected by irradiance value and ambient temperature will be more reasonable for system design.