-
Posts
328 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Issues with Orientation and shading scene
Linda Thoren replied to Luca M's topic in Shadings and tracking
Hello, 1. In version 8.0.19 we have been improving the orientation grouping function. Which version are you using? What tolerance is set in the project settings? 2. The issue could from the fact that you can define multiple gaps for your tracker in PVcase, motor gap, joint gap, horizontal gap between modules and vertical gap between modules (though normally this would lead to the opposite issue, that more modules are placed in the 3D scene than in the system definition). PVsyst we handle only horizontal gap between modules and vertical gaps between modules, so the PVC file doesn’t contain the other information. The PVC file only contains the total length/width of the trackers and the horizontal/vertical gaps between modules. Did you check the "Terrain following trackers" checkbox in the "Frame creation" tab in PVcase? This setting should break the PVcase trackers into multiple smaller trackers for PVsyst (according to the defined gaps), placing the modules at the correct location. In this case, PVsyst will divide the tracker where the motor gap is. I also notice that 163 tables are not defined by modules, potentially the mismatch comes from these tables. Kind regards -
Indeed this is a limitation we still have. The electrical shadings in general in PVsyst are further explained in the following video:
-
Hello, At the moment, small shades at the center of pv modules are not treated and do not create electrical shadings. This is something we hope to improve in a future version. Kind regards.
-
This is not a precise science and can be site dependent. In order of magnitude, one could consider that a site within 10km distance can use the same .MET and .SIT without issues.
-
In the detailed losses window, you can set 1% for the first year degradation as a LID loss in the "Module quality - LID - Mismatch" tab and 0.44% as an average degradation factor in the Ageing tab.
-
Dear Diana, You can generate graphs and plots through the detailed results window (pre defined graphs or hourly graphs for a large amount of simulation parameters). In the Advanced Simulation window, you have additional freedom to create custom plots that also can be included in the report. Another possibility is indeed to create an Output file with the relevant parameters and do the analysis in an external tool. Kind regards
-
The bifacial model presently available in PVsyst is based on a simplified 2-dimensional representation, with similar assumptions as the "unlimited sheds" or “unlimited Trackers” PVsyst simplified calculation. This approximate calculation may be extended to a 3D scene, provided that this 3D scene is sufficiently well represented by the "Unlimited sheds or trackers". You can read more about the bifacial model conditions in the following help page: https://www.pvsyst.com/help/project-design/bifacial-systems/2d-bifacial-model-conditions.html With multiple orientations and sub-systems with different table width, you can in version 8 create new "orientations" in the orientations window and group all the tables with similar characteristics in a sub-system/orientation, and apply the bifacial model to each sub-system in the system window
-
Partitioning in Near Shading Scene
Linda Thoren replied to Surosa Naguri's topic in Shadings and tracking
Hello, You find a full explanation and a summery of common cases in the following PVsyst help page: https://www.pvsyst.com/help/project-design/shadings/electrical-shadings-module-strings/partition-in-strings-of-modules.html?h=partitio#up-to-748 -
Hello, You can find an article in our help that discuss the PR calculations: https://www.pvsyst.com/help/project-design/results/performance-ratio-pr.html?h=pr Kind regards
-
Monthly Meteorological Data Input to PVsyst (TMY – Meteonorm 7.3)
Linda Thoren replied to Abeer's topic in Meteo data
-
In your print screen you see all the details of the number of modules in each sub-array and each table assign to the defined orientations. The difference between your print screen and the video is that the folders are collapsed. Click on the small minus icon collapse the folder and see the total of modules in the system/3D scene for each orientation. If they do not match, you need to add/substract the modules defined in the 3D scene, or in the system.
-
In the 3D scene you can define each table by modules. In the Orientations management you find detailed information about what is defined for each orientation In the following youtube tutorial you find examples of how to define a 3D scene and how to navigate in the window: On our website you can do a request for a training sessions on various topics: https://www.pvsyst.com/en/training/consulting/
-
Hello, The error message indicated that the 3D scene and the system definition does not match. For instance, in the first orientation (tilt 5° and Azimuth 180°), 1564 modules are defined in the system but only 1427 in the 3D scene. Verify also that the orientations, are correctly defined. In PVsyst, Azimuth of 0° is towards the equator, and 180° thus the opposite orientation (North is the northern hemisphere and South is the southern hemisphere)
-
Difference in Produced Energy while comparing with the ageing
Linda Thoren replied to hritik's topic in PV Components
Please send your project to support@pvsyst.com and we can have a closer look. Kind regards -
Indeed, the unlimited sheds only consider the row to row shadings. For a more detailed analysis of the shadings from objects such as trees and buildings, you can define a 3D scene and simulate the electrical shadings with the module layout. The following youtube tutorial illustrates haw to create a 3D scene, and the following link to our help page, describe how to define the module layout: https://www.pvsyst.com/help/project-design/shadings/electrical-shadings-module-layout/index.html
