Kanagavel K Posted March 17 Posted March 17 Dear PVsyst Team, I have a question regarding the flow of loss consideration. If the first loss of the module is the LID (Light Induced Degradation), then the annual degradation should likely be considered after the LID loss in the loss diagram. Could you please confirm if this understanding is correct? Let me know if I am mistaken in my question.
André Mermoud Posted March 18 Posted March 18 The LID loss is not related to the long-term degradation. The long-term degradation is applied to the module performance at the beginning of the simulation step. Now applying the LID loss before or after the long-term loss in the loss diagram has no real importance. However you are right: in the present time, during the simulation, the LID loss is accounted as a percentage of the degraded PV module, when it should remain as a percentage of the initial (not degraded) module. The error is very low, but we will correct this in the simulation for a next version.
Kanagavel K Posted Friday at 09:57 PM Author Posted Friday at 09:57 PM Thank you for response In loss diagram Diagram, loss decimal value is only three digits is available. Can u please guid me how to take more decimal value in the pvsyst if possible.
Linda Thoren Posted Monday at 11:26 AM Posted Monday at 11:26 AM Indeed, you can maximum print 3 decimals in the loss diagram.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now