Samuel Posted December 5 Posted December 5 Hi PVsyst, I'd like to know why is it the value on the electrical loss acc. to strings is zero even after applying proper partitions in the near shading section. Partitions are applied such that creating a rectangle to represent a whole string.
Linda Thoren Posted December 6 Posted December 6 Hi, It is difficult to evaluate without more information about your system and the layout, it could well be that there is not much shading and thus normal that the shading would be 0%. Please export your project as a .zip file to support@pvsyst.com if you wish that we have a closer look. Kind regards
dtarin Posted December 6 Posted December 6 If there are no trees or objects that shade the modules, backtracking is on, and your system is flat, it will not have electrical shading loss.
Samuel Posted December 7 Author Posted December 7 19 hours ago, dtarin said: If there are no trees or objects that shade the modules, backtracking is on, and your system is flat, it will not have electrical shading loss. Hi @dtarin, my model has no trees and with few objects (central inverters), backtracking is on and flat. Which maybe the reason why the electrical shading loss is zero but I have another variant with the same model but reduced number of panels but it does have -0.1% electrical shading loss. See below snips:
dtarin Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Express the report to second decimal to get clear picture, losses could be near zero and are being rounded.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now