HLubke Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 Hi, when running a multiple year simulation and creating the yearly variants, these variants do not appear in the variant list after saving the simulation. The list is updated and the created variants appear in the list if i exit the project and re-open it. Probably the list loded into the user interface is not reloaded after the simulation. Heiko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLubke Posted February 3, 2023 Author Share Posted February 3, 2023 (Version 7.3.1, by the way...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLubke Posted February 21, 2023 Author Share Posted February 21, 2023 Error still in new version 7.3.2. Additionally, now when in the aging tool I change the "Simulation every # years" number with the dial arrows, the list under the parameter choice does not change. When I write the number in the box and press enter, it does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLubke Posted February 22, 2023 Author Share Posted February 22, 2023 Hi, two new issues on this topic: 1) IAM loss changes I created a model and used it as the basis for a multiple year simulation where i generated the additional yearly variants. Now, while the original simulation results in IAM losses of 0,36% the new variants contain IAM losses of 0,34% for all years. Not a single parameter changes except the resulting IAM loss. 2) Variant names The variants are cerated with names based on the original one. If the original is "VARIANT X", the variants receive an additional reference for the respective year, like in "VARIAN X Simulation for the year no 3". However, the name comes out concatenated as in "VARIANT X Simulation for the year no 1 Simulation for the year no 2 Simulation for the year no 3" and so on. This is a long name for 25 years... HELP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtarin Posted February 22, 2023 Share Posted February 22, 2023 (edited) My comment for #1 is that 0.02% is in the noise. I don't much for #2, but you can always rename them in windows explorer without having to rename one at a time in PVsyst. Edited February 22, 2023 by dtarin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno Wittmer Posted February 23, 2023 Share Posted February 23, 2023 Differences in the results of less than 0.1% are within the systematic simulation uncertainty and could be due to rounding errors. They are considered as not significant. The other behaviors described for the aging tool are reproducible and will be fixed in one of the next releases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now