Sofia Nunez

Dear PVsyst, Our team has been running two different different ways to calculate the MV transfo losses. One assuming as a whole system, 4 MV transformers Second, by block, means that for each block, we have its corresponding MV transformer that in total are 4 MV transformer The problem and I don't understand why is that the losses between both versions are huge as you can see below. Could you explain me why it is such a big difference? Thanks

Dear PVsyst, I'm studying a new case in regards to microtilt of the modules. What strange is then when I apply a plane tilt of 1° de simulation run normally, but when I change to 0° a error comes up, not able to calculate the energy balance as it shows in the following figure. Is it possible to fix it?

Hi, in Pvsyst version 8.0.6 you find the option to change the pitch. At least between trackers. However, when we run the batch mode, the GlobInc shows the same values, which it doesn't make sense. Anybody can explain me if I'm doing somehing wrong?

Hi, I have clicked to the question mark to Irradiance Optimization and pop up GCR as you can see screenshoot. On the other hand, André, according to your explanation in this forum, I interpretate that Irradiance Optimization refers to have Tracker Gain in case we have cloudy days (diffuse irradiance). Am I correct? if I am, this option can be selected only if the tracker manufacturer offers this technology to the PV system.

When I select in the Scene Object the "Modify selected objects" the list and management of objects windows pop up with a serie of columns and rows. Is it posible make changes importing information from Excel instead of typing cell by cell?