sunrisepv Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 I have ctreated a tracking system Tilted that is moving from East to WestI have compared backtracking vs backtracking and backtracking (Phi min -45 Phi max 45) seems to have more YieldI have compared backtracking (Phi min -45 Phi max 45) and backtracking (Phi min -55 Phi max 55) and the -55/55 seems to have better results. Is this feasible ?I had in my mind that as the backtracking is more productive at -45/45 the -55/55 should give same results as the tracking angle in order to avoid shading should not be different
André Mermoud Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 This depends on your maximum backtracking angle (depending on the pitch and tracker's width). If this angle is between 45° and 55°, the limit of 45° will arise before the backtracking limit.
sunrisepv Posted March 17, 2016 Author Posted March 17, 2016 These seem logical when with backtracking have worst resultsThe backtracking even at -45/45 seem to have better energy production results than no backtrackingSo the backtracking changes the tracking angle to avoid shadingTaking into account that the Dimention and string configuration does not change when using -55/55 backtracking you will have shading too and the backtracking will correct the tracking angle.The potition that with backtracking have not no shadings shouldn't be the same for -45/45 and -55/55 . So I had considered that actually this two different options make the same rotation withbacktracking.What am I soosing?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now