JStief Posted Friday at 10:04 PM Posted Friday at 10:04 PM (edited) Hello - I recently ran a test on the same variant using 60-minute, 15-minute, and 1-minute TGY (typical GHI year) data from a satellite weather provider. The 15-minute Egrid was less than 60-minute (due to sub-hourly clipping), but (surprisingly) the 1-minute result was the highest out of the three. This was due to higher Global Incident in coll. plane (POA, plane of array). The top line GHI varied by one - due to rounding differences per the satellite provider explanation. I'm hoping to better understand why the pvsyst simulation would have had this result. I reviewed the PhiAng and the hourly tracking angles are identical. See image below of the three different weather file runs' waterfalls. Thank you 1min, 15min, 60min pdf.pdf Edited Friday at 10:07 PM by JStief adding as attachment for better readability
Michele Oliosi Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Dear JStief, This is puzzling, especially because PVsyst will average data to 1-hour steps anyway, meaning that the modeling should be identical. The first thing that springs to mind is that the 1-min, 5-min, and 60-min files are not simply related by averaging. In other words, if you average the 1-minute data, you won't obtain the 60-min data. Is there a chance to check that ?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now