Rafael Santos Posted Tuesday at 11:49 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:49 PM Hi, I performed simulations with different azimuth angles (-10 to 90 degrees, in 5-degrees steps) and surprisingly I got higher annual energy production with most of the azimuth angles that are different than zero (the project is located on the southern hemisphere). Simulation with Azimuth=0°: Simulation with Azimuth=40°: Intuitively, I would think a 0° azimuth would always give me the higher energy yield, which apparently is not so... Of course, the configuration is exactly the same, except for the azimuth. The modules are fixed, tilted 12°, and bifacial. Best regards, Rafael
dtarin Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago No electrical shading loss is showing. If these are bifacial c-Si, you'll want to include electrical effect (modeled according to strings) and then make the comparison.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now