Jump to content

Increase in energy yield with azimuth different than zero


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

I performed simulations with different azimuth angles (-10 to 90 degrees, in 5-degrees steps) and surprisingly I got higher annual energy production with most of the azimuth angles that are different than zero (the project is located on the southern hemisphere).

Simulation with Azimuth=0°:

image.png.12e3fcf206b097636e37b77de0da427e.png

 

 

Simulation with Azimuth=40°:

image.png.7021ee8e1eec9911a7ffcaaf9ea8b420.png

 

Intuitively, I would think a 0° azimuth would always give me the higher energy yield, which apparently is not so...

Of course, the configuration is exactly the same, except for the azimuth. The modules are fixed, tilted 12°, and bifacial.

Best regards,

Rafael

Posted

No electrical shading loss is showing. If these are bifacial c-Si, you'll want to include electrical effect (modeled according to strings) and then make the comparison. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...