Problems about Aging Tool

[CORONA VIRUS]

There is the simulation result of the first year:

 

 

 

and the picture above is the simulation result of 11 years.

As you can see, the result (E_Grid = 69.82 MWh) of the first year in Aging Tool table doesn't match the E_Grid in the first picture (56 MWh), 

is this a bug?

 

thanks

Edited August 11, 2023 by CORONA VIRUS

[dtarin]

Possibly, but why are degradation and degradation dispersion are so high for 1st year?

[Joao Branco]

Im having the exact same problem, and when I use 3D shading it gets a lot worse as you can see in the file bellow.

 

Can you help please?

 

Thanks in advance

aging_pvsyst.pdf

[André Mermoud]

Sorry, we don't know any problem of this kind. 

Please check that in your first simulation, you have the same degradation parameters than for the Aging tool.

If so, please send your full project to support@pvsyst.com, with a detailed explanation of your problem. 

 

[Joao Branco]

On 11/17/2023 at 10:44 AM, André Mermoud said:

Sorry, we don't know any problem of this kind. 

Please check that in your first simulation, you have the same degradation parameters than for the Aging tool.

If so, please send your full project to support@pvsyst.com, with a detailed explanation of your problem. 

 

I did a new simulation with the same parameters and the results were as expected! So it was probably a bug from the program...