CORONA VIRUS Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 (edited) There is the simulation result of the first year: and the picture above is the simulation result of 11 years. As you can see, the result (E_Grid = 69.82 MWh) of the first year in Aging Tool table doesn't match the E_Grid in the first picture (56 MWh), is this a bug? thanks Edited August 11 by CORONA VIRUS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtarin Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 Possibly, but why are degradation and degradation dispersion are so high for 1st year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now