Emi Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 Hallo, we have the following case: Quote 3 sub-arrays defined Sub-array #1 Without OPT Orientation #1 Tilt/Azimuth = 20.0° / -90.0° PV modules: 2 strings of 7 modules in series, 14 total Pnom = 460 Wp PNom array = 6.4 kWp, area = 27 m² Inverters (10.00 kWac) 1 MPPT inputs, Total 5 kWac, Pnom ratio = 1.29 Sub-array #2 With Optimizer 1 Orientation #2 Tilt/Azimuth = 20.0° / 90.0° PV modules: 1 strings of 7 modules in series, 7 total Pnom = 460 Wp PNom array = 3.2 kWp, area = 13 m² Inverters (10.00 kWac) 1 MPPT inputs, Total 5 kWac, Pnom ratio = 0.64 Sub-array #3 With Optimizer 2 Orientation #3 Tilt/Azimuth = 30.0° / 0.0° PV modules: 1 strings of 6 modules in series, 6 total Pnom = 460 Wp PNom array = 2.76 kWp, area = 12 m² The inverter has 2 MPPT, and we have 3 different orientations. Then we would use optimizers in PVSyst. But,when we try to go into "power sharing", there we have inverter with 2 MPPT and 3 subarrays/orientations. How could we manage this situation, i.e. simulate 3 orientations with a 2 MPPT inverter? Thanks a lot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazare Fesnien Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 Dear Emi, In your configuration you must define orientation1 and 2 with "mix 1 and 2" the define your sub-array N°3 as orientation N°3. This will allow you to position three orientation on two MPPTs like the example below : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emi Posted July 13, 2023 Author Share Posted July 13, 2023 Thanks for your reply. If I understand well, you are using 2 strings with equal lenght (2 x 9). My setup is different, 5 orientations with several string lenght. Any chance to accomplish a realistic simulation of following: Many thanks for your help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazare Fesnien Posted July 14, 2023 Share Posted July 14, 2023 Dear Emi, You can simulate virtually your entire project. Attention it is not possible in PVsyst to mix two orientations with different lengths of strings. I just made your system under PVsyst, you just need to make a little change in the naming of the orientations in order to simulate your system correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emi Posted July 14, 2023 Author Share Posted July 14, 2023 Thank you, I understand that I can't simulate my system, correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazare Fesnien Posted July 14, 2023 Share Posted July 14, 2023 Dear Emi, If you can, you should mix orientation 1 & 2 and then separate orientations 4 & 5. Attention, its not at all conventional to put two strings of different length on a single MPPT input Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emi Posted July 17, 2023 Author Share Posted July 17, 2023 On 7/14/2023 at 4:15 PM, Lazare Fesnien said: Attention, its not at all conventional to put two strings of different length on a single MPPT input Ok, I know, then , for a correct simulation in PVSyst, is it possible to use "optimizer" to connect modules with different orientations and connect them to a single MPPT? More, using mixing orientation means to connect different orientations modules to the same MPPT? This point it is not clear for me. Many thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Mermoud Posted July 17, 2023 Share Posted July 17, 2023 Although it is possible to connect strings of modules in different orientations when using optimizers, this possibility is not yet available in PVsyst in the present time. , Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emi Posted July 18, 2023 Author Share Posted July 18, 2023 thanks a lot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now