dtarin Posted August 27, 2022 Posted August 27, 2022 Hello, When using power factor and applying a grid limitation, the pvsyst report makes no indication of where the limit is applied. We are thus unable to verify how it was implemented when reviewing a report. If a user selects account as a separate loss, this loss always appears after the AC losses, but the amount will vary depending on if it is applied at the inverter or at the injection point. One suggestion is to rename "Grid Injection Point" or "Inverter Injection Point" depending on the selection (see photo) Another, possibly in concert to the above or in place of - Re-position the unused energy loss (due to limitation) according to the appropriate selection; at the end of the waterfall for grid injection point (aka point of interconnection), or after the inverter losses for inverter level limitation
Michele Oliosi Posted September 5, 2022 Posted September 5, 2022 Dear @dtarin You are right this may be unclear in the current version of the report. I will file this request to be considered in future versions. We will probably go with option #1 at first. Eventually we may apply #2 but we need to address several other changes in the AC side first.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now