klerindias Posted April 25, 2013 Posted April 25, 2013 Hello,i just did for same location and same meteorological data PVGIS-SAF compare of transposition factor:PVSYST5:http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/5568/transpositionalfactorpv.jpgand here PVSYST6:http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/5568/transpositionalfactorpv.jpgWhy is this diffrence?and dont know why in both examples is diffrence 1kWh/m2.Between this 2 cases is like 2 weeks diffrence.But even 1kWh/m2 shouldnt have so big influence on tilt?Regards
André Mermoud Posted August 21, 2013 Posted August 21, 2013 In the version 5, the default transposition model is the Hay model. In the version 6, it is the Perez model. Now these are models (with their uncertainties), not the reality ! The Perez model is known for giving slightly higher transposed values (by 0 .. 2% according to climates, plane tilts, etc). However please observe that these optima are very broad: a difference of some few degrees (with the same model) represent a very little irradiation difference.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now