Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I use the central inverter in a mountain-mounted power plant, how to set the figure of azimuth to get a more accurate simulation result due to the table has different azimuth? Thanks.
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

The problem of mountain solar plant modeling and simulation

Hi, our company has a project in India, it's a mounting solar plant, the installation condition is quite severe. In our project, we used 280W PV module, 22 PV modules as one string, 180 strings in total ( Around 1 MW DC Capacity). The slope of the fixed rack is 36°, and the azimuths of panels in this project was simplified as 20 PV strings westward 10°, 20 strings westward 5°, 20 strings westward 3°, 60 strings southward, 20 strings eastward 3°, 20 strings eastward 5°, and 20 strings eastward 10°.

To simulate the influence based on variety of azimuths, we established a simulation model in which the seven sub arrays were set according to the assumption of azimuth.

The simulated PR is 83.33%. However, according to the real PR ratio, the simulation result seems quite inaccurate, because the simulation can not include the loss of the mismatch from different azimuths of strings. So I am wondering to know if anyone has meet the same question and how to set these parameters under such conditions?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...