Kyle Kattke Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 I'm using PVsyst V6.44. I've selected the Perez transposition model within my project's parameters. However, in the report, it states the Hays transposition model has been used. I believe my project is using the Perez model for the simulation, and it is simply reporting the wrong model. I tested this theory by changing the transposition model to Hays which resulted in a 1.6% production decrease from my original simulation using Perez.Kyle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Mermoud Posted August 9, 2016 Share Posted August 9, 2016 This was indeed a bug just in the Version 6.44, when using tracking systems: the simulation reverted to the Hay model even when specifying the Perez model.The simulation was consistent with the report mention.This has been corrected in the next versions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dzbull Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I just updated to Version 6.49 and I am now experiencing this same bug. I use the Perez transposition, but sometimes the reports show Hay.When I run a simulation and print the report immediately, the Perez transposition is correctly listed. However, when I save the Variant, open the Miscellaneous tools to change the Resulting estimation from 95 to 99, the report then shows the incorrect Hay transposition.Cheers!Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now