k7524000

In the LID input from the detailed losses, The LID loss[%] is loss from the nameplate power(which does not include power tolerance), or loss from actual flash data(which does include power tolerance)? Nameplate power does not include the power tolerance(usually up to +3% or +5W), and the actual flash data includes the power tolerance. I can see a separate input, module quality loss to consider power tolerance from the nameplate power. So LID input in PVsyst is the loss from the nameplate power, or the loss from the actual flash data? Thank you.

Is it possible to model and simulate mono-facial and bifacial modules in the same project base on the current version? It seems not. So will you develop this type of scenario in near the future?

It works. Thanks.

Yes. I have the same issue. I hope PVsyst team will solve this soon.

Thank you for your illustration. So my answer was correct. Thanks.

If the number of string is the number of strings in the width of a row, it should be one, isn't it? (The case is one row with two strings without MLPE.)

Thank you for your detailed information. Here is one more question. If I have one row with two strings(without MLPE), the number of strings is one or two? Thank you.

Can I use unlimited sheds for shading analysis in tracking systems? Is that in development? If so, should I use near shading(3D analysis) for shading analysis in tracking systems? Thank you.

Ok, Then If we have only one row of modules(but 2 strings) in your shed (whatever portrait or landscape), this will be 2?, Or still one?

I have a question. In the unlimited sheds, I need to put number of string. This is the number of sub-modules(cell strings) in a row(shed)? Or it is the number of modules in parallel in a row?