jamesparkSF

Is there development on including fields to model LeTID or light enhanced Temperature Induced Degradation behavior representative of losses that PERC technology exhibit?

As for the duration of time for the light soaking gain to stabilize, is there a way to manually specify the time or amount of irradiance needed to stabilize this effect? Please see highlighted portion in the attached image.

Is the light soaking factor introduced to the nameplate rating of the PV module or after the binning process (or module quality loss) is factored in? For example, if we say that we have a 160W nameplate module, and a quality loss of -0.8% (reflecting positive binning), assuming a 2% light soaking gain, does that 2% get factored into the 160W OR factored in after the -0.8% quality gain on top of the 160W nameplate of the module?

I have included images taken of (2) simulations. The tilt or azimuth seem to automatically specify 30 degrees on the report however there doesn't seem to be a difference in the calculated produced energy, specific production, or performance ratio. There also isn't a field to modify those values. I suspect this is only a display bug in the new 6.35 update and does not affect the calculations?

Upon updating to V6.35, simulating an N-S one axis tracker, 0 tilt and 0 azimuth are specified however upon the output report, it seems to be showing a 30 degree tilt or a 30 degree azimuth in error. Is this affecting the calculation as well or is this just a display error?