Jump to content

Chen

Members
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Dear sir: Can you take a look at this problem? Why is the backside mismatch loss calculated separately from the front side, rather than being added to the front side like irradiation. thanks!
  2. When I completely shade the front side of the module and allowed the back side to receive light, I found that the loss due to weak light was relatively high.
  3. ok,I agree with your viewpoint, but do you think this calculation is reasonable? if the fornt side of module receive irradiance of 1000 W/m², and the rear side of module receive irradiance of 200 W/m², front side:(f × 22- f × 22) / (f × 22) = 0% (relative) rear side:(f × 21.34 - f × 22) / (f × 22) = -3% (relative)
  4. I understand. What I mean is, if the irradiation intensity on the back of the module is relatively low while that on the front is relatively high, so does it imply that the low-light performance of the rear side is worse?
  5. Because the irradiance of the front side or the rear side of PV module will be different, in this case, there will be a difference in conversion efficiency between the front and back sides,with respect to 1000 W/m².
  6. Dear sir: Has the software taken into account the low-light performance on the rearside of bifacial module? thanks
  7. Dear pvsyst team: If I have an irregular trackers system, with some different pitches and GCR, what is the difference between the reference trackers and automatic mode ( deselecting the reference pair of trackers)?what is the automatic mode? thanks!
  8. OK,thanks.
  9. Will the temperature increase and power decrease when local solar cells of photovoltaic modules experience hot spots be considered in the power generation simulation?thanks
  10. OK,thanks!
  11. Dear PVsyst team: I saw an article in the literature that mentioned a comparison between the settings of UC and UV and actual simulation tests. Can we see if there is still a need to optimize UC for bifacial modules? thanks de Oliveira A K V, Braga M, Naspolini H F, et al. Validation of Thermal Models for Bifacial Photovoltaic Systems under Various Albedo Conditions[J]. ESS Open Archive eprints, 2024, 63: 06323163. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pip.3892 CTG_PIP_Temperature.pdf
  12. OK IRev = Iph +aRev *V,for aRev=800mA/V^2, 800/1000*(-5.2)*(-5.2)= 21.632 (A) ;the externally forced current is 7.93A; how to calculate IRev? thanks
×
×
  • Create New...