Jump to content

Aidenn

Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Aidenn

  1. Hi PVSyst Community,

    Is there a turnaround so I can define this config in the powersharing option in PVSyst?

    For context, 1A.PCS.7 uses SG4400 as inverter and at 27m/s. It exceeds the 4MPPT capacity of the inverter and the PVSyst reads this configuration as 2 INV instead of 1.

    MPPT1 - 585W - 81str

    MPPT2 - 585W - 82str

    MPPT3 - 585W - 47str

                    590W - 36 str

    MPPT4 - 590W - 20 str

                    595W - 60 str

    image.thumb.png.96380be50b7d8aefd62af40a05eb4a18.png

    Thanks for the help!

  2. Hi PVSyst Team,

    Can we determine these parameters with the module info alone? I'm using Jinko Solar  - JKM590N-72HL4-BDV and JKM595N-72HL4-BDV/

    Please show how do we come up with the values. 

    image.png.c29e476b56ba00570f49654539593614.png

    Appreciate your help,

    ~Aidenn

  3. Hi PVSyst team,

    Can someone explain how do PVSyst determine the clipping loss on these periods? I attached also the setting for the MPPT sharing applied for the system. Please let me know for any other files needed to identify these losses below. Thank you!image.thumb.png.66f423e6d828b883d3cdfd9d3cdacdb9.pngimage.png.b58c2d4212b14b4be3494f04f47e541f.png

  4. Hi PVSyst Team,

    I'm designing TFT exported from PVCase to PVsyst.

    1. The trackers imported have no bays. Is this because the modules are connected on the same string? The longer tables are 4string of 28 modules and the shorter ones are 3 strings of 28 modules.  

    2. If this is correct, the treatment is same as non-TFT approach using according to module string and Module layout result for the electrical approach? 

    3. Partition guidelines?

    Thank you,

    Aidennimage.png.c1eee38df16e3931df0af00e7e710747.png

  5. Hi PVSyst Team,

     Since my scene is too large, I created a smaller scene exactly for 1 central inverter.  Base from the module layout I have this values.

    image.thumb.png.7ea1676e21f5809a2c1655ba5425b600.png

    image.png.6f60c80959a3d4838d216edbd91c97cc.png

    image.png.34cafd763c11a5f5c62c623c6ec8726e.png

    QUESTIONS: 

    1. Following the guide from PVSyst Help screenshot above then = 29.4% - 9.3% = 20.1% (Is this the fraction for electrical effect that I will be using in the Nearshading ?)

    2. I also did a 100% Fraction for electrical effect but I'm not sure about the definition of "regular (row-to-row)". can you further explain this? By the way my scene have only tracker tables without trees or other shading. The terrain comes from PVCase. and this is the result. image.png.c4acde2f6afc744b5d53ebe01c995ff3.png

     

     

     

    image.png

    image.png

  6. Hi PVSyst Team,

    I simulated an option for Linear Shading and According to Module string. In the reports, the only difference in the loss diagram is the Sky Diffuse on the Rear Side. Can you explain why this happen? 

    The highlighted one is the " According to module string"

    image.png.ba1d15d6615b3611ea6286ed3595560b.pngimage.png.71b934f2cda533f8af99f53f8ee93cb5.png

     

    Thank you very much.

  7. Yup that solved it. Thanks Michelle. 

     

    Another inquiry in the same project.
    Is it due to the csv file downloaded that I have varying pitch? This one is from the orientation tab saying my pitch is at 5.84m. (see image on the left) then my field properties on the near shading is 7.0m. The correct one is at 7m and 32.8% GCR. 

    image.png.7935e57648a30c5dd48b9025bd55ef20.pngimage.png.b4447905e95b36ad6bbb94281e837716.png

×
×
  • Create New...