Vladislav Iliev
-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
SAT at different azimuth near shading loss
Vladislav Iliev replied to Vladislav Iliev's topic in Shadings and tracking
Anyone? -
Hello everyone. Any idea why azimuth parameter is not option in optimisation tool. Project is with SAT. Sincerely, Vladislav
-
Hello. I have the following staging: same site and two single axis tracker (N-S) variants: - idenatical parameters expet the azimuth.One is 0 degree , one is -47degree. - Backtracking is ON, Latitude 44° 49' 0" N, flat/No terrain Results of simulation indicate better overall performance of the 47degree. Whitch contradicts with articles about performace of deviations from the 0 azimuth. Main difference comes from near shadings. Can someone explain those results? Comparison attached. Sincerely, Vladislav
-
How panels with sub-modules should be configured (e.g. partitionwise / fraction for electrical effect,%) ? Any cases /examples when fraction for electrical effect should be set to less then 100% ?
-
Hi. In help-section explanation of the "Effect of the by-pass diodes" starts with 3 hypotesis and states: Fraction for electrical loss should always be set to 100% How would that change in case of PV modules with 3 sub-modules in portrait orientation ?
