Jump to content

Daniel

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. A bit late, but I don't agree with the point that there are not a lot of subhourly data. Today (and it was the case last year when this was posted) almost all satellite data providers have subhourly data (stallite images are now 5-30min).. One might even say that a lot of providers were forced to adapt to this limitation of PVsyst and provide hourly files... A true simulation on a lower timestep would be a huge gain in precision / effort on our end... And naively, I don't understand the difficulty... a part from the thermal model that has inertia, all the other elements can be establish at whatever time step... I agree that the computing time would probably be 4 fold if one let us say wants to have 15min simulations... but I don't think this is a real problem.
  2. Hello, Would it be possible to add the irradiation wheighted temperature as a choice in the list of parameters available in the report? More and more contracts are using the temperature correction for the PR calculation and it would be useful to have it directly in the report.
×
×
  • Create New...