Lucas Simão

ReTeste - Santa Catarina_Project.VC1-Report.pdf

The forum is presenting an unknown error when I try to attach the file, I'm trying to save new formats but haven't been able to solve it yet

ReTeste - Ceará_Project.VC0-Report.pdf

Hey Michele, thank you for your answer! I did think about that, and that since the tilt will be so low, the impact of the bifacial modules will be way lower due to the amount of exposition of the back of the module. But still, even with those considerations, it makes little sense.

Thank you for your feedback. Still, I haven't been able to identify the precise point that's causing this. I've corrected the tilt to the ideal for each location, checked the pitch between tables in the shading scene, but still the Global Incident in Coll. Plane for Ceará (sim#2) won't go higher than 0,7%. Do you have any other hunches as to why this is happening?

I have just created two similar simulations in 2 different states in Brazil (Ceará and Santa Catarina), with the first having a higher Global Horizontal Iradiation than the other. Yet, the generation in the site with the lower Global Horizontal Irradiation is higher than the other one. From what I've been able to understand, the biggest difference between the simulations is the Global Incidento in the Collector Plane, but still it doesn't seem like it's supposed to occur this way. Is there any clear mistakes in the simulation that can explain this difference? If not, what justifies such high generation from a site with a lower irradiance?