Jump to content

hcapdevi

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hcapdevi

  1. I found this explanantion, juste after posting my post.

     

    The nominal power Pnom is the maximal output ac power of the inverter in any conditions.

    Some manufacturers define a maximum power Pmax , which is the maximum power attainable under specific conditions (they sometimes say "half an hour", but it is probably related to the temperature of the inverter). Now this temperature is very difficult to estimate, this would require a complete knowing of the environment of the inverter, ventilation conditions, etc. This is not done in PVsyst, and therefore the maximum power cannot be taken into account.

    By the way in "normal" systems correctly sized, this bonus is probably low. And in "strongly oversized array" systems, the maximum output power is detemined by the contractual acceptance of the grid, and this bonus doesn't apply.

    NB: perhaps in a future version, PVsyst will be able to take the Pmax value into account for inverters installed ourdoor. This will require additional specifications about thermal behaviour from the manufacturers.

  2. Hello ?
    In my simulation I am using a Huawei SUN2000-115KTL-M2, with a nominal power of 115kVA and a max power of 125kVA.

    I have two inverters, I charge them a lot (DC/AC = 1.64 ...).

    In my report the maximum power is only 230 kW, why dont i reach the max power of the inverters 250kVA ?

    Is this normal or Pvsyst does not use the max power ? 

     

    Thanks for your help !

     

    image.png.3fc462c408ac8f1a65819f7cf8ae2478.png

  3. I am used to using the power sharing function, but this time it is not working.

    I define my sub arrays

    image.thumb.jpeg.e2602fc326112d7e59318c1305a2e758.jpeg

    I use the power sharing function (everything works fine)

    image.thumb.jpeg.dcb5b3f20e652162b206c6806c4c485f.jpeg

    I start the simulation, but the power sharing is not taken into account, and it is not saved after the simulation is done.

    image.jpeg.7e373cca2b49e552bfcc8cf415d4db5f.jpeg

    image.thumb.jpeg.aeb0ce25bd733e9453ca5be745385151.jpeg

    Is this a bug or a miss used of myself?

     

    Thank you for your help ?

  4. I'm running a simulation with a Kaco inverter, only one MPPT.

    The project is oriented both South and Nord, I was expecting a lot of mismatch losses due to the only MPPT but no. I only have “0.1%” (the same amount that with a Huawei inverter with 10 MPPT).

    Someone have an explanation? Is this normal or is this a bug?

     image.thumb.png.f0c3b6dcf488d48ffcd6c510f4c3e045.pngimage.png.012092fe47d99d7ea123536ec365c81e.pngimage.png.e968c9f7b25363129eff9b59876af63b.png

     

    Thank you for your help !!

     

     

  5. Hello,

    I am testing different inverter on the same project to make a choice.

    I am testing an inverter from the brand Kaco with only one MPPT.

    I don’t know how to, or if it is even possible, to create a system with different string’s length on a same MPPT. Since I only have one MPPT I can’t use the multi mppt function.

    Kaco is telling me that the mismatching losses of such a configuration (different number of modules in parallel string on a single mppt), is balanced with the better efficiency), but I would like to see that myself on PVsyst.

    Does anyone can help me?

×
×
  • Create New...