Jump to content

msleiman8

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by msleiman8

  1. Their mentioned formula has a typo I believe. Considering muPmpp is a negative value then the formula should be: (1 - muPmpp * (TArrayAver - Tarray) ) OR (1 + muPmpp * (Tarray - TArrayAver ) )
  2. Hello, I have noticed a strange difference in the way PVsyst v7.0 handles AC ohmic losses. I used variants previously simulated on PVsyst v6.78 and ran the simulation on v7.0. Observations listed below: 1- In detailed losses summary the selected AC ohmic loss (%) is now higher in v7.0 while the suggested cable length and size remain the same. However, in the loss diagram the actual considered loss throughout the year for AC ohmic is actually lower on v7.0. 2- The parameters used in v6.78 were 1% AC ohmic and in loss diagram turns out as 0.85%, when using v7.0 it shows 1.2% AC ohmic and in loass diagram 0.68%. The thing is, I tried this on several existing variants and the results were not consistent, nevertheless, the AC ohmic loss value always changes. Sometimes the change is more significant than others. Appreciate your clarification.
×
×
  • Create New...