Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dear PVsyst Forum,

I have encountered an issue with the Sandia IAM model implementation in PVsyst. I found the values for the six parameters of the Sandia IAM model in the help documentation and used them to calculate the IAM value. However, the result I obtained does not seem to match the expected outcome.

I understand that the Sandia IAM model has been deprecated, but I am trying to compare the results from different IAM models, so I need to calculate the results using the Sandia IAM model.

Could anyone explain why the calculations might not be giving the correct result? Are there any specific conditions or considerations I should be aware of when using these parameters in PVsyst?

Thank you in advance for your help!

Best regards,
Zhang Chao

image.thumb.png.c339a5c490f840be3a20f3c509362547.png

image.thumb.png.aa2087e585df3aae51c9751727912862.png

Posted
9 hours ago, André Mermoud said:

Yes, sorry, there are errors in the parameters of the help. We have to correct them.

Here are the correct parameters:

image.png.cdc912a8bf35f8f54c3ec5997fa91274.png

This gives this curve:

image.png.6690336ca17026c562ea55c796bbe9bd.png

 

 

Thank you, André Mermoud. I obtained the correct IAM curve using the corrected parameters.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...