smeredith Posted October 18 Posted October 18 I have noticed when modeling systems using SolarEdge architecture that the SolarEdge inverter efficiency (and overall, the system energy) doesn't change when the strings are configured differently - as long as the total number of strings of each string length remains the same. As an example, compare the two variants below. Simulation A: Subarrays: Subarray 1: SE 33.3k inverter with 24 modules per string, 45 strings in parallel Subarray 2: SE 33.3k inverter with 22 modules per string, 45 strings in parallel String configuration: 10x inverters with 3 strings of 24 mods/string and 0 strings of 22 mods/string 10x inverters with 0 strings of 24 mods/string and 3 strings of 22 mods/string 5x inverters with 2 strings of 24 mods/string and 1 string of 22 mods/string 5x inverters with 1 string of 24 mods/string and 2 strings of 22 mods/string Results: Inverter efficiency loss: -1.77% Yield: 1944.584 MWh Simulation B: Subarrays: Subarray 1: SE 33.3k inverter with 24 modules per string, 45 strings in parallel Subarray 2: SE 33.3k inverter with 22 modules per string, 45 strings in parallel String configuration: 15x inverters with 2 strings of 24 mods/string and 1 string of 22 mods/string 15x inverters with 1 string of 24 mods/string and 2 strings of 22 mods/string Results: Inverter efficiency loss: -1.77% Yield: 1944.584 MWh Although both simulations have a total of 45 strings of 24 mods/string and 45 strings of 22 mods/string, the string configurations are quite different. Because the inverter loading is different, I would expect the overall efficiency loss to be different. Yet when I run the simulations, I see that the efficiency loss and yields are identical. Is this intended behavior? If so, why?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now