Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Partial shadings of some sub-modules: when one or several cells are shaded, the whole sub-module becomes reverse-biased, the by-pass diode is activated above the current corresponding to the residual power of the diffuse part. This results in a quite different situation as the previous one: the true Pmpp maximum is decreased in voltage (voltage of each sub-module, plus the diode reverse voltage), but the current remains the same Impp.

I would like to ask if that sentence "the true Pmpp maximum is decreased in voltage (voltage of each sub-module, plus the diode reverse voltage), but the current remains the same Impp".           
is the result (a benefit) by using optimizers ??

Thank you!

Posted

Yes, the optimizers may yield a little benefit, especially with irregular shading situations  (building integration).

With sheds arrangements, the benefit is really very low.  

For a simple system in sheds like this  (3 rows of 16 modules in landscape on each table)

Optimizer_WhitePaper_2016.png.abac809081b28adab3cc22392520ca06.png

the annual results  (at Marseille ) are shown  here for different optimizer technologies.

Optimizer_WhitePaper_Result_2016.png.7fa584284047bcf9287be0992841fc8f.png

NB: most optimizers on the market are "Buck only". Only SolarEdge uses Buck/Boost.

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...