dtarin Posted June 18, 2019 Posted June 18, 2019 Hello, It is currently a shortcoming in PVsyst when defining a table size less than the width of the string (when defining partitions), as this results in lower electrical effect losses. It is not always possible to define a table size one string in width, such as cases where sites contain complex undulations or unique geometries, and a smaller table size is needed. The module layout method does not always work (https://forum.pvsyst.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4334), nor is it applicable to large sites. Development to address this shortcoming by allowing smaller tables to be joined into one string would be much appreciated.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now