Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There would appear to be a bug for "Produced Energy" in the report generation when reports are generated during batch simulations and use bi-facial modules, please see the attached screenshot for an example.

Best,

H.

SumatraPDF_2019-01-21_11-50-37.png.952378fe9ed8db2377251c489060b9c1.png

See "Produced Energy"

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Please explain what you think is a bug in the "Produced energy".

This normalized way of presenting the simulation data is indeed not well-suited for Bi-facial systems.

The additional energy (bifacial gain) is indeed added to the Ya value, i.e. deduced from the array losses La.

If sufficient, it could indeed lead to negative La values, and even PR values greater than one.

However I don't know any official definition of these normalized variables for describing the bi-facial systems.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hi Andre,

Because the energy is given in W/year, which is absurd for a utility scale system, MWh or MW/year would make much more sense I think. This leads to a very large number indeed which as you can see extends across the page.

Best,

H.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...