Jump to content

Aidenn

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi PVSyst Team, Can we determine these parameters with the module info alone? I'm using Jinko Solar - JKM590N-72HL4-BDV and JKM595N-72HL4-BDV/ Please show how do we come up with the values. Appreciate your help, ~Aidenn
  2. Hi PVSyst team, Can someone explain how do PVSyst determine the clipping loss on these periods? I attached also the setting for the MPPT sharing applied for the system. Please let me know for any other files needed to identify these losses below. Thank you!
  3. Hi Linda, There's already a PVSyst file with all inputs are present. The request is to generate another report to have HV losses excluded. Is unticking this box the correct way to exclude the HV losses? (see image below)
  4. Hi, PVSyst report with HV transformer and HV transmission line losses excluded. How to do this?
  5. You're a great help Jéremie! Thank you.
  6. Hi PVSyst Team, I already generated the PVSyst report and these warnings appear during initialization. The 3D scene comes from PVCase and a TFT. Can someone assist how to deal with these errors? Appreciate your help.
  7. Do I need to change my settings so that the PVCase imported scene should show the trackers altitude correctly?
  8. Hi PVSyst Team, I'm designing TFT exported from PVCase to PVsyst. 1. The trackers imported have no bays. Is this because the modules are connected on the same string? The longer tables are 4string of 28 modules and the shorter ones are 3 strings of 28 modules. 2. If this is correct, the treatment is same as non-TFT approach using according to module string and Module layout result for the electrical approach? 3. Partition guidelines? Thank you, Aidenn
  9. Hi PVSyst Team, Since my scene is too large, I created a smaller scene exactly for 1 central inverter. Base from the module layout I have this values. QUESTIONS: 1. Following the guide from PVSyst Help screenshot above then = 29.4% - 9.3% = 20.1% (Is this the fraction for electrical effect that I will be using in the Nearshading ?) 2. I also did a 100% Fraction for electrical effect but I'm not sure about the definition of "regular (row-to-row)". can you further explain this? By the way my scene have only tracker tables without trees or other shading. The terrain comes from PVCase. and this is the result.
  10. Hi Jeremie, What is the resolution for this? I'm having the same issue.
  11. Hi PVSyst Team, I would like to know how to change the PVCase Fields azimuth from tilted axis to horizontal axis. Or is this predetermined by PVCase? The tracking model to be used in my project is the ATI DuraTrack HZ v3 (see specs below)
  12. Hi Michele, Follow up question. with a different scenario. What if I have a LANDSCAPE orientation 84 modules 3 string AT 28 module/string. What will be my partition for my x and y?
  13. Hi PVSyst Team, It's my first time using PVCase file for the Nearshading scene and some trackers are below the terrain mesh. Can I do auto altitude or should the adjusment be done on the PVCase software?
  14. Thanks André
  15. Hi Jeremie. I've received your response. I've followed the csv format as per PVSyst guidelines but same thing happened. Please advise
×
×
  • Create New...