Jump to content

Horizon

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Dear sir or madam: I have a question about some words of the help documentation (The loss diagram provides a quick and insight look into the quality of a PV system design, by identifying the main sources of losses) , were you implying that the "loss diagram" only displays the main sources of losses, while other contributing losses are factored into the calculations but not explicitly displayed? And the PR value cannot be calculated through the losses on loss diagram? Hope for your response. Best regards!
  2. I can't thank you enough!
  3. Dear sir or madam: I have some questions about partition, I need your hlep! First I am confuse about help page: https://www.pvsyst.com/help/shadings_partitioninstrings.htm In my opinion: (a) The Fig.1 should be like the Fig2, Nb. rectangles in height (Y) is 1, similarly, Nb. rectangles in height (Y) is also 1. Unless this string is separately connected to one MPPT of the inverter, any part of the string be shading, otherwise, any part of the string is obstructed and the power of the string will decrease rapidly. (b) The Fig.3 looks very unique, although I particularly understand the role of bypass diodes by-pass diodes. If objects like trees or buildings or mountain create shadow on tables,the shadow should be irregular, I think maybe the Fig.4 should be more reasonable. (c)In my understanding,whether the Fig.5 applied on relatively flat ground with only front and rear obstruction? I have designed many moutain solar plants, the shadow on tables is irregular and it's not a gradual expansion in the Y direction, for example the Fig.6. Ahthough the half-cut moudule in solar plant, whether the Fig.4 is more conservative and realistic? These are just some of my opinions, maybe they are all wrong. I would greatly appreciate it if you could give me some comments to help me correct them. Your backing is incredibly valuable to me.
×
×
  • Create New...