[Loss diagram difference with azimuth]

The first one is for azimuth 12° and we are wondering as to how there is a difference of 10 percent in specific production between south and 12°, is there any way to explain this as the loss diagram is pretty much the same only a 2% difference. In all the research articles as well we have an understanding that from 0-40° azimuth change thre is only a 2-5 percent difference in specifc production, so could you explain why this is the case in PVsyst, and also which value should i look into so i can actually justify the 10 percent reduction in specific production? Thank you

The below picture is for azimuth 0 

[Near shading drawing in standalone system]

Thank you this works well

[Near shading drawing in standalone system]

[Near shading drawing in standalone system]

How do i tackel this issue its a roof with different orirntations is there a possibility to design this?

[Near shading drawing]

How do you get exact polygon lengths? How do you toggle the distance function for a more prescise polygon? For example i have a polygon with specific dimensions how can i use these dimensions while constructing it for the near shading analysis

[EW systems orientation from pvcase to pvsyst]

How to solve this issue ? 

[near-shading with tracking, without 3D scene]

How do you import a autocad file with the polygons so we can draw exactly to the map for the near shading analysis? is it possible to do this and if so it would be nice to have video that explains that. Thank you

[EW systems orientation from pvcase to pvsyst]

Hello Andre,

Im currently working on a sytem that incorportes both EW and trackers and i have an export file from PVcase. Pvsyst is able to read only the tracker system but im unable to run the simulation with both systems present. Is there any possibility to perform a simulation with a combination of systems ? If so it would be great to have a meeting to futher discuss and go through the process. Thank you for your time. Have a nice day.

[EW systems orientation from pvcase to pvsyst]

Okay i understand, Thank you for the clarifications.

I also have another question in EW systems PVsyst automatically uses several orinetation option and so a bifacial mode cannot be activated, Is there another way to use the funcion of bifaciality, in theses systems for yiels analysis?

 

[EW systems orientation from pvcase to pvsyst]

1. n Comparision to PVsol the specific yield using meternom data in PvSyst shows a significantly higher value for an EW system. What could be the problem here.
2. if there is anyway that we could specify our own orientations after importing the file from PVcase in Pvsyst? It would be of great help if you could hep us out in this as our earlier projects, we have designed using only Autocad requires a specific yield and a specific orientation as these systems are already constructed?
3. Is it possible that you have PAN files for specific solar modules?

[EW systems orientation from pvcase to pvsyst]

How do you actually use the different orientation option for the east-west system?

unable to simulate near shading for east west systems? How to do it?

Single tracker systems which orientaion need to be selected fot import from pvcase?