Jump to content

Ashley

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ashley

  1. I have checked the simulation and it shows that power sharing is already defined. Please advise why the losses are still so high. thank you.
  2. I am currently using PVsyst version 7.4.5 and I would like to follow-up on this issue... Can i clarify what you mean by "PVsyst has currently some trouble handling imbalances between MPPT powers when they are both due to a difference in nominal DC power, or differences due to the orientation which causes the power to shift from a string to the other." I ran 2 different simultations recently and i observed a significantly higher inv loss over nominal power for the latter (2.78% more). My question is when should i be enabling the multi-MPPT feature? 1. 125CX-P2 inverter with multi-MPPT feature disabled 2. 125CX-P2 inverter with multi-MPPT feature enabled with various input DC power but same orientation
  3. Dear Michele, Good afternoon. I cannot send over the files to support@pvsyst.com due to IT restrictions imposed by my company. I am still pending IT team to whitelist the email address. I have checked through the raw data file but did not notice any missing or non-physical data. Could there be another reason for this?
  4. Hi Michelle, Thanks for the clarification. I managed to generate 10 separate MET files from the raw data but was unable to generate TMY using the ten MET files. I am not sure why.
  5. Hi, I was trying to import meteo data into PVsyst which contains 10 years data, but i encountered an error message after running 1 year worth of data (see photo attached). Please advice.
  6. I see. Thank you for the clarification. However, I am not seeing any changes in "Inverter Loss over nominal inv. power" % after I managed to normalize the power sharing as shown in the screenshot. I am getting a % loss of 4.26. Is this normal? Thanks.
  7. Sorry, i don't quite understand the explanation. May i know the reason why the number of MPPT in each sub-array must be a multiple of the number of inverters in the configuration it belongs to? Meaning to say, if I wish to do power sharing across 7 x 125KTL Sungrow inverters with a total of 84 MPPTs, each sub-array that i create has to be a multiple of 7 (e.g., 1,7,14,21, etc)? Another question i have is whether this is a new feature by PVsyst as i did not encounter such an issue when i was using an older version. thank you
  8. Hi there, I encountered an error msg saying that the number of MPPT is not a multiple of the number of inverters. I am trying to do power sharing across 7 x 125 KTL Sungrow Inverters (total MPPT 84). The sum of MPPTs across the 4 sub-arrays adds up to 84 but PVsyst does not allow power sharing across the 7 inverters (e.g., 12 MPPT x 7 = 84 MPPT). Kindly advise.
×
×
  • Create New...