Andrés Fernández

Got it, I understand this would be done in the near shadings scene. My question was more about whether the plane-of-array irradiance was correctly estimated, considering that both the tilt and the base slope vary. Would the standard practice in this case be to define multiple orientations? That is, grouping different arrays based on their real tilt and real azimuth? Thanks for the support.

Hello everyone, I'm working on a PVSyst project where the terrain is undulating, which makes it challenging to define the tilt of the modules properly (for Orientation and near shading scene). I've attached an example image to illustrate the case better. Any advice or references would be greatly appreciated. https://waareeimages.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/energy_of_the_sun_and_convert_it_into_electricity_5a25f22d3d.jpg Thanks in advance!

Hello, I am currently working on a project involving GTI irradiance measurements in the field. However, I have observed discrepancies between the GTI values used in the simulation (GlobInc) and those loaded in the MET file on certain days. It is important to note that the system utilizes a single-axis solar tracker. These discrepancies typically occur, in the majority of cases, around 17:00 hours (please refer to the attached image). I would greatly appreciate any opinions or suggestions. Best regards.