David Bourdon

Good Morning PVsyst Support Team and PVsyst Community, I would like to know if there is a possibility from the software to define in the export output file a specific sub-system (or all of them separately) instead of results combined for the global project. The objective would be to check the behaviour of each configuration define for a project within the software to evaluate specifically the overload losses over the inverters for example. Thank you in advance for your answer. Best regards David

After trying several potential options to solve this I may have found a possible explanation (but not 100%). I've saved my poles as shading selected objects and started a fresh new simulation with a random meteorological file to avoid any external effect of my 3D : no effect, still not snapping. I've opened the shading selected objects in PVsyst 7.4.8 and again started a fresh new simulation : no effect, still not snapping. Then I've noticed that the snapping was working for several poles at the same altitude so I've tried changing the altitude of my other poles and then it worked with no issue. It means that depending of the altitude (I don't know what the tolerance is), the snapping function is not able to find the edge to connect the end of the cable object. 1st picture, they are more or less at the same Z coordinates ; snapping is working perfectly 2nd picture, the poles are at a different altitude, not snapping, mainly X coordinates which is affected by the poles location Now what I can't explain is that the snapping is working for another pole at a different altitude, mainly with a Y coordinates affected by the poles location... I can share a *.SHO file with my poles position and cables snapping/not snapping to help identify the issue, if necessary. Thanks for your feedback, D

Good Morning PVsyst support and PVsyst community, I'm creating this thread as I've been struggling for several hours now trying to draw an overhead line in my 3D scene and use the snapping function (by pressing CTRL) of the cable object to connect both ends of the cable (I use PVsyst for years now, so it's not new to me and I've done it several times in the past without any issue). For some reasons, the cable object is not able to recognize the edge of my second shading object to connect. I've tried several type of shading objects to see if it makes a difference but so far still not working (parallelepiped, composed object from parallelepiped, electric pylon) The start point is never a problem but the end point is never found and can't connect to my second shading object. I've tried to remove the other objects from my 3D scene such as topography, ground image, even the modules and keeping only the two "pylones" that I want to connect but it's not changing anything. I'm using PVsyst 8.0.13 and tried as well with 8.0.12, but same effect. If I place my cursor where I want to connect the end of the cursor and then press CTRL, the end point moves to another location with nothing visible. I've tried to manually place the cable between the poles but moving in 3D it's almost impossible to do something clean. If I start a fresh new 3D scene for the same project and try to create basic parallelepiped and connect the cables it works... If you have any idea or advise to solve this... Thanks in advance ! Best regards

Good Morning PVsyst Team, A quick question regarding the export of the simulation variables. Is it possible to define a list of predefined variables that we want to export ; not only those applicable within the simulation, but a determined list with specific variables (even if not used). By default PVsyst will not propose the variables that are not applicable within the project (i.e : horizon if no impact ; HV lines if not defined : HV transformers if not defined, etc...) . In order to develop our methodology, we would like to create an export which has always the same number of columns within the CSV file. Is it something possible within the software ? We were not able to find an option to force the extract of specific variables. Thank you in advance

Good Afternoon, Actually we (in our company) have noticed the same kind of behaviour, starting recently (2-3 weeks ago). No matter the PVsyst version (some colleagues are working with 7.2.8 ; me with 7.2.14) ; and no matter the size of the simulation, opening a "Grid Connected" simulation takes more time than before (up to 1 min).