PVsyst's forum

Welcome on PVsyst's forum.
It is currently Mon Jun 17, 2019 5:14 pm

All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 12:53 pm 

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 3:21 pm
Posts: 14
There would appear to be a bug for "Produced Energy" in the report generation when reports are generated during batch simulations and use bi-facial modules, please see the attached screenshot for an example.

Best,

H.


Attachments:
File comment: See "Produced Energy"
SumatraPDF_2019-01-21_11-50-37.png
SumatraPDF_2019-01-21_11-50-37.png [ 51.57 KiB | Viewed 692 times ]
Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 12:13 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1586
Please explain what you think is a bug in the "Produced energy".

This normalized way of presenting the simulation data is indeed not well-suited for Bi-facial systems.
The additional energy (bifacial gain) is indeed added to the Ya value, i.e. deduced from the array losses La.
If sufficient, it could indeed lead to negative La values, and even PR values greater than one.

However I don't know any official definition of these normalized variables for describing the bi-facial systems.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2019 3:46 pm 

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 3:21 pm
Posts: 14
Hi Andre,

Because the energy is given in W/year, which is absurd for a utility scale system, MWh or MW/year would make much more sense I think. This leads to a very large number indeed which as you can see extends across the page.

Best,

H.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited