PVsyst's forum

Welcome on PVsyst's forum.
It is currently Tue Sep 22, 2020 3:23 am

All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 12:03 pm 

Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 12:14 am
Posts: 12
Hi,

I have been running some simulations with bifacial modules and it caughts my attention the fact that the performance ratio calculation does not take into account the global in-plane irradiation on the rear side of the module. Should not it be added to the calculation to comply with the PR definition?

Thank you in advance for the help.

Best,


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:36 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1680
This is a question of definition.
I don't know if there is an official answer, but due to the difficulty of evaluating the rear side irradiance, I really doubt that this is a good idea.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:09 am 

Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:00 am
Posts: 1
Hi André,

Is that a good question some years later? Is the Bifacial Performance Ratio still calculated as the monofocial one?

Thank you,

Javier.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2020 5:31 am 

Joined: Sat May 05, 2018 9:57 pm
Posts: 5
Quote:
Hi André,

Is that a good question some years later? Is the Bifacial Performance Ratio still calculated as the monofocial one?

Thank you,

Javier.
Hello Javier

Yes, until know the biracial performance ratio is calculated as the mono-facial.

"PR for bifacial systems

The definition of the performance ratio should be something like a standard, defined by an official instance, and accepted by everybody.
Now I have not yet seen any reference which would define a performance ratio for bi-facial systems. Therefore PVsyst cannot propose any specific value in the present time.
The value provided presently with the PVsyst results uses the definition of the Monofacial systems, so that the bi-facial gain comes as an increase of this ratio.

NB: The main objective of the PR is to find an indicator for comparing real and simulated data, therefore which may easily be evaluated using simple (and "primary") measured data.
However neither the rear side irradiance, nor the part of the bifacial gain is available in usual measurements."

Source: viewtopic.php?t=31

Best Regards,
Nedal Nassar


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited