# PVsyst's forum

Welcome on PVsyst's forum.
 It is currently Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:40 pm

 All times are UTC+02:00

 Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ]
 Print view Previous topic | Next topic
Author Message
 PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:30 pm

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2019 1:58 pm
Posts: 6
Hello forum,

I am still in the early stages of working with PVSyst, so I hope the following question is not too stupid.

I wonder why the electrical loss according to strings decreases with reduced inter-row spacing.
I have assumed that it increases analogously to the near shadings: irradiance loss with smaller inter-row spacing due to higher mutual shading?

I have examined three different variants:

1) pitch: 12.5 | limit profile angle: 17° | electrical loss acc. to strings: -1.93 %
2) pitch: 13.2 | limit profile angle: 15.5° | electrical loss acc. to strings: -2.09 %
3) pitch: 13.6 | limit profile angle: 14.8° | electrical loss acc. to strings: -2.12 %

Top
 PostPosted: Fri Dec 20, 2019 9:09 pm

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 3:31 am
Posts: 341
What is the nature of your shade scene? Is there terrain and/or other shading objects? Are you modeling in unlimited sheds or with a 3d shade scene?

Top
 PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 4:15 pm

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2019 1:58 pm
Posts: 6
The terrain is flat and there is forest in the direct surroundings. The sheds have a distance of 30m to the trees in east, south and west direction and 20m to the trees in north direction to minimize shading losses.
I model with a 3D shade scene.

Top
 PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:18 pm

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 3:31 am
Posts: 341
That is interesting. Without knowing the details of the simulation (partition size, tree height and design, table dimensions/orientation, location,etc), I would say that it is likely that as the modules move in closer to one another, they experience a higher near shading beam loss, but no additional electrical string activation. Since the beam loss increases but there is no additional string activation, the string loss comes down since that additional area of the array is now a light loss rather than an electrical one.

Top
 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ]

 All times are UTC+02:00

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ PVsyst SA Announcements (read only)    Latest news    PVsyst's forum rules FAQ (read only)    Installation and use of PVsyst    Meteo data    PV Components    Shadings and tracking    Simulations : parameters    Simulations : results    Standalone and pumping systems Your questions about PVsyst    Howto    Problems / Bugs    Meteo data    PV Components    Shadings and tracking    Simulations    Suggestions    Tutorials : Feedback and requests Links    PVsyst website    YouTube Channel