PVsyst's forum

Welcome on PVsyst's forum.
It is currently Thu Dec 12, 2019 2:50 am

All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:08 pm 

Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:45 pm
Posts: 3
I wanted to get an understanding of how power factor support is provided in PVsyst. I ran 2 cases (for same system design and loss assumptions with only difference being, case 1: had leading power factor of 0.98 and case 2 had leading power factor support of 0.95) to check the power factor feature in PVsyst and found that the apparent power output in both cases is different, which I would have thought to be same. I have attached the waterfall page for both cases for reference. Please let me know why is the apparent power difference in both cases and is PVsyst accounting for power factor support correctly.


Attachments:
File comment: Case 1: 0.98 pf
Waterfall for 0.98 pf case.JPG
Waterfall for 0.98 pf case.JPG [ 71.29 KiB | Viewed 3457 times ]
File comment: Case 2: 0.95 pf
Waterfall for 0.95 pf case.JPG
Waterfall for 0.95 pf case.JPG [ 75.66 KiB | Viewed 3457 times ]
Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:52 pm 

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:37 am
Posts: 82
Location: Spain
It seems that in the 2nd case you don't have AC losses...

Anyway, I think that PVsyst only considers power factor in terms of Active = Aparent * cos (Phi). It does not take into account how the equipments, cables, etc... affect to reactive power.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:47 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1616
This is quite normal. The produced energy at the output of the inverter is the Active energy.

The treatment of the Power factor is explained in detail in the Help, or in the FAQ Can I define a Power Factor in PVsyst ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2019 1:08 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 3:31 am
Posts: 227
Hello, I have a question on PF implementation and thought I would keep it in this post.

I have a Power Electronics central inverter which requires a 0.97 lagging PF. In PVsyst, do I select "limit in active power", or "limit in apparent power" on the "Grid Power Limitation" tab? Inverter Pnom is defined as apparent power.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited