|47% IAM factor Losses using Scandia Model
|Page 1 of 1|
|Author:||linkeshd [ Fri Aug 24, 2018 6:41 pm ]|
|Post subject:||47% IAM factor Losses using Scandia Model|
Dear fellow PVSyst users,
I recently was surprized by some very large loss factors when using Boviet 6612P 320 Optimized modules, as shown:
File comment: Crazy Big IAM Factor LossesInvestigating the IAM curve, the Scandia curve looks really strange:
2018-08-24_12-35-56.png [ 28.1 KiB | Viewed 1843 times ]
File comment: Scandia Lab's IAM factor versus othersIn general, I thought that the Scandia model was experimentally confirmed. Is this the case? Has anyone seen this before? What would you consider a reasonable approach to this?
2018-08-24_12-33-09.png [ 25.34 KiB | Viewed 1843 times ]
|Author:||André Mermoud [ Tue Aug 28, 2018 11:42 pm ]|
|Post subject:||Re: 47% IAM factor Losses using Scandia Model|
I really don't understand how you got this result.
The Sandia model is hard-coded in PVsyst, the values are unmodifiable and give a result very close to the normal Fresnel's model.
This curve is probably a user-defined IAM profile, specified in your PV module, with completely erroneous parameters.
File comment: Sandia model and Fresnel, normal glass and with AR-coating
IAM_SandiaModel.png [ 18.29 KiB | Viewed 1803 times ]
|Page 1 of 1||All times are UTC+02:00|
|Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited