# PVsyst's forum

Welcome on PVsyst's forum.
 It is currently Thu Jan 21, 2021 11:51 pm

 All times are UTC+02:00

 Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ]
 Print view Previous topic | Next topic
Author Message
 Post subject: Simulation of a fence shadingPostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:46 pm

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 3:01 pm
Posts: 29
Hi,
I'm trying to simulate a 5cmX5cm fence, 500m long! I tried simulating the real fence on a 10m distance, waited for the shading factors simulation 2days but it did not finish so I stopped it.
What would you recommend?

edit: the CPU usage by PVSyst during any simulation I do is always limited to 10%/12%, even if I give it a "high priority" in window's task manager.
Is there a tweak for increasing cpu usage to, say 80%?

thanks

Top
 Post subject: Re: Simulation of a fence shadingPostPosted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:35 pm

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1686
The computation has probably entered an infinite loop.
For the simulation of such a long fence, you are advised to represent your fence just by one (or two) long parallelepiped, and neglect the vertical parts.
The shading calculations sometimes give errors with "holes" in closed shapes.

Top
 Post subject: Re: Simulation of a fence shadingPostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2013 10:55 am

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 3:01 pm
Posts: 29
Just one parallellipepede is like putting a wall.
I'm not sure I understood your recommendation well...If I want to represent a 2m high fence 10cmx10cm, 10m long for example, and only one array to estimate the loss on one array before extrapolating, is it what ou recommend to put 200/10=20 parallellipepede of 10m one on top of the other?

Top
 Post subject: Re: Simulation of a fence shadingPostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 4:50 pm

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1686
What I mentioned was for a "massive" safety fence (for example on the border of a roof): you can approximate it as one or two long horizontal parallelepipeds (e.g. 5x5 cm2, 200 m long), and neglect the vertical parts (you can increase the parallelepipeds size for an average).

I don't have an exact solution for a wire fence. Probably you can also approximate it as 2-3 long horizontal paralelepipeds. Choose the diameters as an equivalent of the wires diameters on the concerned fence area.
And for the electrical effect (shading factor according to module strings), you can define these parallelepipeds as "thin objects", and specify the electrical effect ratio to a rather low value (or even a null value). The objective is to avoid the "normal" shading effect on the string.

Top
 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ]

 All times are UTC+02:00

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ PVsyst SA Announcements (read only)    Latest news    PVsyst's forum rules FAQ (read only)    Installation and use of PVsyst    Meteo data    PV Components    Shadings and tracking    Simulations : parameters    Simulations : results    Standalone and pumping systems Your questions about PVsyst    Howto    Problems / Bugs    Meteo data    PV Components    Shadings and tracking    Simulations    Suggestions    Tutorials : Feedback and requests Links    PVsyst website    YouTube Channel