PVsyst's forum

Welcome on PVsyst's forum.
It is currently Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:22 am

All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 12:09 pm 

Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 11:07 am
Posts: 2
I am using version 6.6.2 and observe the following problems:

1)
When I make a "Near Shading" model with 3 PVs - each split into 3 module string, I get to a point where I can generate the two shading factor tables: 1 table for the "linear case" , and the other tables for the "according to module strings" case. However in the actual simulation, the shading loss end up with the same value for the two cases, although the tables are quite different (and look correct). So it seems that the simulations are carried out only with the table for the "linear" shading case.

2) The button for "module layout" only appears when I use Grid Layout - not for the "stand alone" project case. Does this mean that the corresponding feature only works for Grid connected cases ?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat May 27, 2017 11:14 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1680
The "linear" shading loss is the result when using the first table.
The second table is used for computing the Electrical loss (accounted in the Array losses), which results basically of a difference between the two tables.

The Module layout tool - which is closely related to the inverter behavior - is indeed not available for Stand-alone systems in the present time.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 5:25 pm 

Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 11:07 am
Posts: 2
Ok - I hope that the module layout part will come also for stand-alone systems soon.

However, I have another related issue: When I do a simulation in Grid-connected systems, and compare "module layout" results with "according to module string" results, I get a much smaller loss for the "according to module strings" case, than for "module layout". I have of course made sure that the actual module layout is the same in both cases (the module partitioning in near shading set-up and the module layout).

I would expect that the "according to module strings" case would be an upper bound, since a partly shaded string here is counting for a full "loss of the whole string". I am using "100% fraction for electrical effect".

When I look at the shading fraction table for "module string case" it looks correct, but when I output the shading factors to a file, they appear strange, and seems to be of a size that indeed will result in a loss which is too low.

Can you please explain - thanks ?

regards
Iso


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2017 4:17 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1680
This is because you have not defined the "rectangles" representing a string correctly. You have defined one rectangle as one submodule.
In the option "According to module strings", one rectangle should correspond to one full string.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited