PVsyst's forum

Welcome on PVsyst's forum.
It is currently Tue Oct 16, 2018 9:50 am

All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:24 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 8:29 am
Posts: 2
Location: Dap Royal Center Istanbul Turkey
Hi,

I have a Ktcc value problem. As you see the attachment value is starting from 1.6 . I guess it should be around 1.1 . Attach file is for first half of 2017 and from meteocontrol datalogger. I can not understand why ktcc is very high in my ASCII datas. Could you please give me an advice regarding problem?

Thanks

BR
Onur Gunes


Attachments:
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG [ 44.88 KiB | Viewed 1786 times ]
File comment: problem screen
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG [ 115.53 KiB | Viewed 1800 times ]
Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:27 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1493
This means that your data are not correct.
It could be a problem of units, or more probably the calibration of the solarimeter.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:09 pm 

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:04 pm
Posts: 1
Hi,

I have the same problem with the clearness index and I have check the calibration and the units.

This data come from a wheather station which is weekly maintenance because we are alse checking the soiling on syte project. I have import this data asPVsyst standard format. (GHI and temperature)

The weather station has two horizontal pyranometers and other one on the inclined plane. Moreover, I have 2 panel which are checking the soiling, one photo cell. All of the have a normal range of irradiance.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 6:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1493
The clear day model is well established, and represents thre real data with an accuracy of 2 to 3% (depending on the Linke coefficient).

If you have measured data far over these values (daily sums), either you are not using the correct solar geometry (the latitude or altitude is incorrect), or your data are not correct.
I can't see any other possibility. This is physically impossible.

NB: It is possible to measure temporarily high irradiances, up to 1300 or even 1500 W/m2 perpendicularly to the sun. This is due to a bright sun cumulated with a reflexion on a neighbour cloud. But these are transitory phenomenons, during some few seconds or minutes. Never a full day.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited