# PVsyst's forum

Welcome on PVsyst's forum.
 It is currently Sat Aug 08, 2020 4:50 am

 All times are UTC+02:00

 Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ]
 Print view Previous topic | Next topic
Author Message
 PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:33 pm

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1662
Let's consider row arrangement (sheds) systems only. In this case when one row puts its shade on the next one, the bottom cell row is primarily shaded.
Let's call submodule the set of cells protected by one by-pass diode. In most modules (60 or 72 cells), there are 3 by-pass diodes and therefore 3 "sub-modules", usually disposed in length within the module.
Let's suppose that the modules are disposed in landscape, and all modules of the bottom row belong to the same string.

Now it is often believed that when the bottom cell row is shaded, the by-pass diodes will limit the electrical loss to the sub-module row, i.e. the string electrical production will remain 2/3 of the normal production.
This is only true (about) if you have one only string per MPPT (violet curve).

If you have more than 2 strings in parallel, the electrical shading factor is shown on the next figure: this shows that as soon as 1/3 of the sub-modules are affected by the shade, the electrical loss is 100%!
Attachment:
File comment: Electrical shading factor according to the number of shaded submodules in a string
(this plot may be constructed point by point using "Tools" /"Electrical behaviour of PV arrays")

Shadings_NbSubmodules.png [ 22.73 KiB | Viewed 11378 times ]
Therefore in rows arrangements, the protection diode don't recover any electrical loss: the full string width (module with) should be considered as electrically inactive as soon as the bottom cell is shaded. With the calculation "according to string" in the 3D model, this means that with row systems the Fraction for electrical loss should always be set to 100%. With "Unlimited sheds", the width of the full string should be considered.

The next figures show how the I/V curves are affected: the first shows a not-shaded string
Attachment:
File comment: One only string without shadings

Unshaded_string.png [ 13.46 KiB | Viewed 11376 times ]
and when 1/3 of sub-modules are shaded: we loose in voltage, but the current remains the same.
If the string is alone in the array, the Pmpp loss is proportionnal to the number of shaded sub-modules.
Attachment:
File comment: One string with 1/3 submodules shaded

Shaded_string_alone.png [ 9.21 KiB | Viewed 11376 times ]
Now when there are other strings in parallel, the MPP is chosen on the resultant I/V curve, and the voltage Vmpp is the same for all strings: for the shaded string, only the diffuse contributes !
Attachment:
File comment: 1/3 shaded string in a 3-strings array

Shaded_row_in_3strings.png [ 19.48 KiB | Viewed 11376 times ]

Top
 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ]

 All times are UTC+02:00

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ PVsyst SA Announcements (read only)    Latest news - Bifacial Modelling and 3D Drawing    PVsyst's forum rules FAQ (read only)    Installation and use of PVsyst    Meteo data    PV Components    Shadings and tracking    Simulations : parameters    Simulations : results    Standalone and pumping systems Your questions about PVsyst    Howto    Problems / Bugs    Meteo data    PV Components    Shadings and tracking    Simulations    Suggestions    Tutorials : Feedback and requests Links    PVsyst website    YouTube Channel