PVsyst's forum

Welcome on PVsyst's forum.
It is currently Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:07 am

All times are UTC+02:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:33 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 1484
Let's consider row arrangement (sheds) systems only. In this case when one row puts its shade on the next one, the bottom cell row is primarily shaded.
Let's call submodule the set of cells protected by one by-pass diode. In most modules (60 or 72 cells), there are 3 by-pass diodes and therefore 3 "sub-modules", usually disposed in length within the module.
Let's suppose that the modules are disposed in landscape, and all modules of the bottom row belong to the same string.

Now it is often believed that when the bottom cell row is shaded, the by-pass diodes will limit the electrical loss to the sub-module row, i.e. the string electrical production will remain 2/3 of the normal production.
This is only true (about) if you have one only string per MPPT (violet curve).

If you have more than 2 strings in parallel, the electrical shading factor is shown on the next figure: this shows that as soon as 1/3 of the sub-modules are affected by the shade, the electrical loss is 100%!
Attachment:
File comment: Electrical shading factor according to the number of shaded submodules in a string
(this plot may be constructed point by point using "Tools" /"Electrical behaviour of PV arrays")

Shadings_NbSubmodules.png
Shadings_NbSubmodules.png [ 22.73 KiB | Viewed 7057 times ]
Therefore in rows arrangements, the protection diode don't recover any electrical loss: the full string width (module with) should be considered as electrically inactive as soon as the bottom cell is shaded. With the calculation "according to string" in the 3D model, this means that with row systems the Fraction for electrical loss should always be set to 100%. With "Unlimited sheds", the width of the full string should be considered.

The next figures show how the I/V curves are affected: the first shows a not-shaded string
Attachment:
File comment: One only string without shadings
Unshaded_string.png
Unshaded_string.png [ 13.46 KiB | Viewed 7055 times ]
and when 1/3 of sub-modules are shaded: we loose in voltage, but the current remains the same.
If the string is alone in the array, the Pmpp loss is proportionnal to the number of shaded sub-modules.
Attachment:
File comment: One string with 1/3 submodules shaded
Shaded_string_alone.png
Shaded_string_alone.png [ 9.21 KiB | Viewed 7055 times ]
Now when there are other strings in parallel, the MPP is chosen on the resultant I/V curve, and the voltage Vmpp is the same for all strings: for the shaded string, only the diffuse contributes !
Attachment:
File comment: 1/3 shaded string in a 3-strings array
Shaded_row_in_3strings.png
Shaded_row_in_3strings.png [ 19.48 KiB | Viewed 7055 times ]


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC+02:00


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited